🟡Relating to an insurer’s responsibility to review and audit a third-party administrator.

🟡 SB 1151: Remote insurance audits with weaker on-site oversight

What it says it does:
SB 1151 keeps the requirement that insurers must review and audit the third-party administrators who manage claims and benefits. It says the goal is to modernize oversight and make audits more efficient for today’s digital systems.

What it actually changes:
It removes the rule that required a biennial audit to be done on site. Insurers can now choose to conduct those audits remotely. The frequency of reviews and audits stays the same, but the physical, in-person inspection is no longer mandatory.

Who is pushing for it:
In the files, the Texas Association of Life and Health Insurers, the Texas Association of Health Plans, and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas registered in support. The Texas Department of Insurance was listed “on” the bill, not for or against.

Who benefits:
Large insurance companies and third-party administrators save time and money by avoiding in-person audits. Remote options also make it easier for companies with digital systems to meet compliance requirements with less disruption.

Who gets left out or exposed:
Everyday Texans who rely on fair and accurate claims processing. Many issues that show up during an in-person visit, like unsecured data or staff mistakes, are harder to catch when audits are done through screens instead of office walk-throughs.

Why this matters long term:
Removing the on-site requirement changes the quality of oversight. It hands more control to insurers and their contractors to decide how deep an audit should go. Without clear standards for remote auditing, the state could end up with oversight that looks good on paper but misses real-world problems.

What to watch next:
Whether the Texas Department of Insurance creates new rules to make remote audits meaningful. If not, insurers could use this flexibility to cut costs while reducing the depth of their own accountability.

Bottom line:
SB 1151 makes oversight easier for insurers but riskier for consumers. Flexibility is not the same as protection. Texans deserve rules that keep audits real, not just virtual.

Questions to ask lawmakers:

1. What minimum standards will ensure a remote audit is as meaningful as an on-site audit, not just a document check?
2. If repeated complaints or red flags appear, should the law require an on-site audit instead of leaving it optional?
3. Would you support a review clause that measures whether audit findings, complaints, or enforcement actions change after this shift to remote audits?

#SB1151 #TexasPolicy #InsuranceOversight #ConsumerProtection #WatchTheRules