🟡Relating to the establishment and powers and duties of the Texas Advisory Committee on Geopolitical Conflict.

🟡 SB 2312: Secretive security committee with sweeping powers

What it says it does:
Creates a new Texas Advisory Committee on Geopolitical Conflict to prepare the state for war or supply chain collapse, including audits of drugs, utilities, and other critical systems.

What it actually changes:
Shifts oversight into a nine-member body chaired by the Adjutant General, places all research under the Governor’s office, exempts meetings from the Open Meetings Act, and allows the committee to accept private donations.

Who is pushing for it:
Support in files from Texas Public Policy Foundation and State Armor Action. Author is Sen. Bryan Hughes.

Who benefits:
Executive leaders and the Texas Military Department gain control of information. Outside groups with donor access or advisory contracts gain influence.

Who gets left out or exposed:
Local governments, watchdogs, and the public lose access to detailed findings. Communities most at risk from outages or drug shortages have no guaranteed seat at the table.

Why this matters long term:
Sets a precedent for secretive planning with subpoena power and donor funding. Findings can later justify industry carveouts or exemptions without open review.

What to watch next:
Follow-up bills may use the committee’s confidential reports to drive procurement or vendor preferences. Watch for new exemptions tied to “critical supply chain” or “strategic drug stockpile.”

Bottom line:
SB 2312 prepares for emergencies but concentrates control in the Governor’s office and military leadership. Texans get secrecy, not transparency, and private influence could shape state security planning.

#SB2312 #TexasPolicy #TexasSecurity #EmergencyPlanning #WatchTheRules